The Rise of Metalcore
Before addressing the trends that have aged poorly, it’s crucial to understand the rise of metalcore. Emerging in the late 1990s, bands like Killswitch Engage, As I Lay Dying, and Shadows Fall were at the forefront, blending aggressive guitar riffs with melodic elements and hardcore punk’s raw energy. This new sound captivated audiences, leading to a surge in popularity during the early 2000s.
Metalcore’s appeal lay in its versatility. It combined the intensity of metal with the emotional depth of punk, attracting fans from both genres. As the scene grew, bands began experimenting with different styles, leading to the incorporation of clean vocals, breakdowns, and electronic elements. However, not all these innovations have been well-received over time.
Bury Tomorrow’s Perspective
Bury Tomorrow, formed in 2006, has been a staple in the metalcore scene. Known for their melodic approach and powerful live performances, they have consistently pushed the boundaries of the genre. In recent interviews, members of the band have expressed their thoughts on certain trends that they feel have not aged well.
According to the band, while innovation is crucial for any genre’s growth, some trends were more about following fads rather than genuine artistic expression. These trends, they argue, have contributed to a homogenization of the genre, diluting its original essence.
Trends That Aged Poorly
1. Over-reliance on Breakdowns
Breakdowns are a hallmark of metalcore, providing a rhythmic, mosh-inducing section that fans eagerly anticipate. However, during the genre’s peak, many bands began overusing this technique. Bury Tomorrow highlights that while breakdowns can be effective, their overuse has led to predictability and a lack of creativity in songwriting.
In the early 2000s, a breakdown in every song became almost a requirement, leading to a saturation of similar-sounding tracks. This trend, while initially exciting, eventually led to listener fatigue. As a result, bands that relied heavily on breakdowns struggled to maintain long-term appeal.
2. Excessive Use of Auto-Tune and Electronic Elements
As technology advanced, many metalcore bands began incorporating electronic elements and Auto-Tune into their music. While these tools can enhance a song when used sparingly, they often became a crutch. Bury Tomorrow points out that the excessive use of Auto-Tune, particularly in clean vocal sections, detracted from the raw, emotive quality that metalcore is known for.
Similarly, the overuse of electronic elements, such as synths and programmed beats, led to a loss of the organic, band-driven sound that initially attracted fans to the genre. This trend, prominent in the late 2000s and early 2010s, has since seen a decline as bands return to more traditional instrumentation.
3. Formulaic Song Structures
Another trend that Bury Tomorrow criticizes is the formulaic approach to songwriting that many bands adopted. This typically involved a predictable sequence of verses, choruses, and breakdowns, often resulting in songs that felt generic and uninspired.
While structure is important, the band argues that adhering too strictly to a formula stifles creativity and innovation. As the genre matured, listeners began craving more dynamic and unpredictable compositions, leading to a shift away from these formulaic trends.
4. Lack of Lyrical Depth
Lyrical content is a crucial element of any music genre, and metalcore is no exception. Bury Tomorrow notes that during the genre’s commercial peak, many bands produced lyrics that lacked depth and substance. This was often a result of focusing more on catchy hooks and choruses rather than meaningful storytelling or emotional expression.
As the genre evolved, audiences began seeking more authentic and relatable content. Bands that failed to adapt their lyrical approach struggled to maintain relevance in the ever-changing musical landscape.
5. Image Over Substance
The metalcore scene has always had a visual component, with bands often adopting a certain aesthetic to complement their music. However, Bury Tomorrow highlights that during certain periods, image often took precedence over musical substance.
As bands focused more on their appearance and marketing, the quality of the music sometimes suffered. This trend has gradually faded as listeners prioritize authenticity and musicianship over image-driven success.
The Evolution of Metalcore
Despite these trends that have aged poorly, metalcore as a genre has shown remarkable resilience and adaptability. In recent years, there has been a resurgence of bands that prioritize musicality, authenticity, and innovation, breathing new life into the scene.
Bury Tomorrow themselves have evolved, continuously refining their sound and exploring new lyrical themes. This commitment to growth and authenticity has allowed them to remain relevant and respected within the metalcore community.
Moreover, the genre has seen a fusion with other musical styles, such as progressive metal, post-hardcore, and even pop influences. This blending of genres has expanded the boundaries of metalcore, attracting a diverse audience and ensuring its continued evolution.
Conclusion
Bury Tomorrow’s critique of certain metalcore trends serves as a reminder of the importance of authenticity and innovation in music. While some trends have not stood the test of time, the genre’s ability to adapt and evolve ensures its longevity and relevance in the ever-changing musical landscape.
As metalcore continues to grow and change, bands and fans alike must embrace both its roots and its potential for innovation. By learning from the past and pushing creative boundaries, metalcore can continue to thrive and inspire future generations of musicians and listeners.